Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weather Star Jr


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. slakr \ talk / 02:06, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Weather Star Jr

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject doesn't meet notability standards at WP:GNG due to lack of significant reliable source coverage. Agyle (talk) 11:20, 15 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment. Sources I did find, which I don't consider significant coverage:


 * [That's the entire article]


 * [Minor mention amidst boring FCC legislative stuff]


 * [Does not mention model by name; I'd guess it's referring to the Jr., but it's not verifiable.]


 * --Agyle (talk) 11:36, 15 June 2014 (UTC)


 * I forgot to mention the reference currently in the article, an archived page from The Weather Channel (seller of the Weather Star Jr) concerning an FCC requirement for audio beeps when a severe weather warning is initially announced. The archive.org link also contains a link to an archive of the Weather Star Jr.'s manufacturer's Installation and User's Guide. Neither of these are independent sources, so they don't count toward notability.


 * All of the very limited information in this article that is verifiable through reliable sources is already included in Weather Star, so no merge is needed, although a redirect to Weather Star would seem useful. Agyle (talk) 19:16, 15 June 2014 (UTC)


 * I found another article (possibly a press release), in the same Communications Engineering Digest as mentioned above; quoting entire article:
 * --Agyle (talk) 23:58, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 * --Agyle (talk) 23:58, 15 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Subject isn't notability via WP:GNG due to lack of significant reliable source coverage, and there's no other obvious basis in which to justify it.Jacona (talk) 20:39, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 16 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 07:54, 23 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete, & redirect to Weather Star, fails the significant coverage test of the general notability guidelines. --Bejnar (talk) 15:55, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.