Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weather poverty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Closed early per WP:SNOW. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:20, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Weather poverty

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable neologism. Q T C 07:42, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I think this should be speedily deleted as nonsense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Porturology (talk • contribs)
 * Comment It does not qualify for g1 deletion as the following does not apply Pages consisting purely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history. Q  T C 07:48, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Agreed but what of "implausible theories, or hoaxes; some of these, however, may be deleted as vandalism in blatant cases" as well as wp:snow
 * Delete A neologism which can easily be remedied with a suggestion to the article author that a tanning bed would probably reinvigorate you and take you out of the blahs.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 08:27, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The article's creator, who is also the inventor of the notion, tells us outright on the talk page that this is abuse of Wikipedia to publish a previously unpublished idea that hasn't gained traction in the world at large, in violation of our No original research policy. Uncle G (talk) 10:48, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Snow delete per Uncle G. Wikipedia articles must be supported by secondary reliable sources, of which none exist for this subject. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  17:47, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:OR or nonsense --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:54, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, I agree, it's ridiculously close to freezing here in Finland compared to what it should be at this time of the year, but really, this is an unencyclopedic neologism. J I P  | Talk 16:33, 22 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.