Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WebEdition


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Consensus is to delete the panda ₯’  10:15, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

WebEdition

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Original prod was: "This seems to fail notability requirement, in particular Wikipedia:Notability (products) and Notability (software)". Declined by User:Fayenatic london with rationale "has sources". I never said it didn't, I just said and will say again that they are inadequate (four refs, one to SourceForge hosting website, one to own website, two to some niche websites). As written, promotional spam of non-notable product. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 11:07, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:06, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:06, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:07, 16 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio Let's talk about it! 13:22, 23 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: another PHP-based CMS without mention outside niche press. Compliance with WP:GNG would require at least some coverage outside the scope of e-magazines devoted to web development. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 10:43, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.