Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WebRangers Entertainment (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  05:10, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

WebRangers Entertainment
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable company. Also included in this AFD is its CEO Chintan Pavlankar Sports Devotee (talk) 11:04, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because he is the CEO of the non-notable company:




 * Delete both, notability failure for both stubs as written. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 11:15, 25 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep Please check the reference link. Company coverage is in reliable, independent secondary sources & even notable actors have commented in media about the same...as this complies with wiki norms the result of the last deletion was keep. Cpavlankar (talk) 11:45, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * No, the previous discussion was closed for procedural reasons. There was no discussion of whether the article meets Wikipedia guidelines. --bonadea contributions talk 14:23, 25 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete both. Two of the three refs (the same refs for both articles) are very clearly based on the same press release since the text is almost identical (and the Wikipedia articles is also very closely paraphrased to the point of WP:COPYVIO). The third ref, from Tellychakkar, is a trivial mention in a gossipy news column - definitely not significant coverage in a reliable source. --bonadea contributions talk 14:23, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:49, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:49, 25 April 2016 (UTC)


 * I understand that Chintan Pavlankar Wikipedia does not mets the standard of wikipedia and can be deleted but WebRangers Entertainment mets the standards of wikipedia and apart from tellychakkar none of the other website is considered to be a gossipy website due to which first nomination was results was keep. As per the guidelines as far as whatever written on the artist is supported by a reference third party link it can stay on there for WebRangers Entertainment Cpavlankar (talk) 21:44, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete both as nothing suggests the necessary notability improvements, nothing else convincing including for a somewhat newly founded company. SwisterTwister   talk  05:46, 26 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.