Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WebRouser


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 02:27, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

WebRouser

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not a WP notable product apparently. In-depth independent coverage about this web browser required by WP:CORPDEPTH to justify an article separate from its parent company, Eolas, has not been presented. The patent litigation which seems to be only source of notability here (not counting press releases) is adequately covered in the parent company article. FuFoFuEd (talk) 06:40, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 20 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:35, 26 June 2011 (UTC)




 * Merge and redirect to Mosaic (web browser) Stuartyeates (talk) 05:37, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MacMedtalk stalk 17:01, 4 July 2011 (UTC)




 * Delete, clearly not notable in the sense we mean it. --Nuujinn (talk) 22:46, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.