Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Web band


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.

Web band
Not notable, advertising, not verifiable, or full of inherent POV. Delete. Natalinasmpf 07:38, 12 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete, just not encyclopedic. feydey 22:50, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. nonnotable neologism yet. mikka (t) 23:07, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

Comments by anonymous users
Please note that votes by anonymous users are not counted in the deletion process. And please, don't go out and make an account just to vote - those aren't counted as well. You need to be here for a while before your vote carries any weighting. --216.191.200.1 17:42, 13 October 2005 (UTC) Delete Why did no one take my proposal to delete DEEZ NUTZ seriously?- Russki
 * Delete, You know what else you should delete? (preceding unsigned comment by 23:23, 12 October 2005)
 * Delete, "Sex" Article. It lacks pictures. Legendary_Jarl [HG] (preceding unsigned comment by 01:35, 13 October 2005)
 * Delete, I need viagra (preceding unsigned comment by 05:31, 13 October 2005)
 * Keep I like it. -- Von (preceding unsigned comment by 05:31, 13 October 2005)
 * Keep Why not just call it a stub? Someone will be along to expand it sooner or later. Clarissimus (preceding unsigned comment by 06:15, 13 October 2005)
 * I don't know, JARL IS AN UBEREMO - KoE (preceding unsigned comment by 15:47, 13 October 2005)

who cares? :(


 * Keep We're going to keep it, right? Right?
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.