Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Webchutney


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep and cleanup. The page isn't written well, yes, but that doesn't mean it has to be deleted. The company shows sufficient notability - they just picked up a deal with Canon. See also other sources below. If somebody could give this a nice re-write, we'd be good to go. m.o.p 22:27, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Webchutney

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Speedy declined. Doesn't seem notable to me. UtherSRG (talk) 14:10, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

and a few others at this search Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:53, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Spammy, unreferenced, no evidence of notability, WP:MILL. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:34, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. See
 * http://www.televisionpoint.com/news2009/newsfullstory.php?id=1246458281
 * http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/2006/08/14/1791967.htm "Cool Companies"
 * Delete, perhaps speedy delete. Unreferenced spam. Neither of the two links given in the post above goes far towards establishing notability. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:55, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as spam; either that or a total rewrite. Hairhorn (talk) 20:01, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Webchutney is somewhat notable, being the No. 3 digital agency in India according to Economic Times. Added a few refs. utcursch | talk 05:31, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete.Advert. Its quite an accomplished page for a bog standard topic. But they are a digital advertising agency...so I feel the bar to notability has to be higher because any of their 50 staff could write that page. Szzuk (talk) 20:23, 15 February 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.