Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Webgah


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 is almost  Singu  larity  08:03, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Webgah

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Page was already deleted once as spam. Was recreated, perhaps is better. However, I still believe it's not notable, and there is a clear conflict of interest problem in its creation. The Evil Spartan 16:47, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * If it's kept, it needs serious copyediting. My inclination would be delete unless it can be rewritten by an independent editor.kateshortforbob 17:17, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Speedy-deleted once as a G11, was immediately re-created. The username of the creator of the article, Webgah, is the same as the website. The article has two items in the reference list but neither one mentions Webgah, so it has no reliable sources to show notability. The creator has not responded to any messages left on his Talk page about the apparent spam issues. COI by itself is not a reason for deletion, but lack of notability is. EdJohnston 17:25, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletions.   The Evil Spartan 18:00, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletions.   The Evil Spartan 18:00, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletions.   The Evil Spartan 18:00, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletions.   The Evil Spartan 18:00, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't seem to meet WP:WEB and the obvious COI problem doesn't help. -- lucasbfr talk 18:27, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, probably speedily, as per above. --Yamla 19:08, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, as I already did once, as spam per creator behavior. Daniel Case 02:36, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete per kateshortforbob as possibly fixable and remotely notable, but really spammy. Bearian 13:55, 6 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.