Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Webjet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:18, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Webjet

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Throughout most of its existence this article has been a rather blatant advertisement, with all substantive content the work of two WP:SPAs. Recently someone added a badly sourced section on complaints, prompting a complaint to OTRS. The sources for the article are the company's website and... oh, that is the only source. I've now pruned it down form a blatant advertisement to a directory entry. Wikipedia is not a directory. Guy (Help!) 22:29, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Being a listed company, I expected to find references (per WP:LISTED) and there are a host of them on Google news. This is one of many. StAnselm (talk) 23:07, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep plenty of gnews hits indicates this is a notable company. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 22:54, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep being a publicly listed company on the Australian Stock Exchange is enough. LibStar (talk) 06:12, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree that it is a blatant advertisement.JusticeSonic (talk) 11:10, 27 December 2010 (UTC) — JusticeSonic (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep per WP:LISTED. WWGB (talk) 11:48, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.