Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weblocks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:17, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Weblocks

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It exists, but it doesn't meet WP:NOTABILITY. Boleyn (talk) 12:53, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:55, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, I don't think this meets GNG either. Interesting software but even the primary sources are down by now. Not historically significant, there are other continuation-based web frameworks that maybe could meet the bar. --Ysangkok (talk) 04:17, 30 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.