Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Webucator


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:25, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Webucator

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Falls under WP:NEO, written like a tutorial. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 23:43, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I am not seeing anything to back up that horrible neologism. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:54, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Neologisms must go. § FreeRangeFrog 05:19, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:NEO is not a reason for deletion, only for possible renaming, but this is original research, and WP:BOLLOCKS to boot: "website development is a young field at around 20 to 25 years old"—if the article author was aware of the World Wide Web over 20 years ago then Tim Berners-Lee doesn't deserve the credit that he has had for initiating it. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:31, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Phil Bridger. Original research. Versus22 talk 09:44, 5 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.