Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wedding Babylon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Babylon series (Imogen Edwards-Jones). (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 23:01, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Wedding Babylon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This topic may not meet WP:NBOOK. The Daily Mail piece looks to be a précis of the book by the authors: they are credited on the byline. There's a proper review in the Kaleej Times. &mdash; rybec   20:42, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:32, 1 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge to Babylon series (Imogen Edwards-Jones). There's a consolidated review in Australian Woman's Day. Brief mention in The Telegraph. Full review in Kaleej Times. In aggregate not enough for a standlone article, but enough for a redirect and merge. Imogen Edwards-Jones wrote a series of 8 "Babylon" books the most popular Hotel Babylon. They should be combined to a series article. If any book gets too long, split off to a standalone. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 03:40, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge - Making a new merge article and placing the Babylon series into it does not sound like a bad idea at this point. It will reduce the sparse coverage and strengthen content in the presence of others. 209.255.230.32 (talk) 16:26, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * (nominator) A merge and redirect seems best to me as well. &mdash; rybec   20:06, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.