Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wednesday's Child (TV program)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:29, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Wednesday's Child (TV program)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not fulfill the WP:GNG Guerillero  &#124;  Parlez Moi  03:11, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Common branding for adoption segment on local news (it can also be known as Tuesday's Child), but claiming it's exclusive to NBC and only sponsored by Freddie Mac is incorrect; many other stations no matter the network run adoption/Big Brothers/Sisters segment, and often it's just a simple community service from the station, not a sponsor opportunity (it was in the past by the Freddie Mac Foundation but it looks like they abandoned the sponsorship). No real target to put this towards unless someone wants to put effort into a section within Adoption in the United States.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 03:35, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  13:34, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  13:34, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 17:42, 13 March 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:08, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No in-depth coverage to show it passes WP:GNG, and unclear as to whether or not the information in the article is correct.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:25, 31 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.