Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wee Sing Video Series


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Withdrawn. The question of a split, as raised by Angie Y., can be pursued on the talk page if desired. Olaf Davis (talk) 18:12, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Wee Sing Video Series

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable children's video series, tagged for lacking sources for nearly a year. Having searched for sources myself, all I can find is sites offering these videos for sale - I can't find any significant coverage of them by reliable sources. Robofish (talk) 00:25, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per, , , , , and, . The series also sold millions of copies. Joe Chill (talk) 00:49, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Joe Chill. Werner Heisenberg (talk) 01:25, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Joe's sources. Also note that the popularity of the series was strongly pre-1995 so we should not give prejudice just because sources are hard to find.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 01:53, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep the article could use a lot of work, but the sources provided above show it's notable.  ~DC  Talk To Me 01:55, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The Entertainment Weekly piece and the extract from Billboard almost jump the notability hurdle alone, there are doubtless other sources as Joe Chill's results are demonstrating. There's enough to verify a lot of info and the notability is there IMO. Someoneanother 02:47, 14 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep and seperate into individual articles The series is very poipular, most of the cast members from both of my favorite videos in the series are still alive, and each movie deserves a seperate article! Angie Y. (talk) 03:33, 14 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Hmmm, apparently I completely fail at searching for sources. :) Consider this AFD withdrawn. Robofish (talk) 13:43, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.