Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wee web


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:19, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Wee web

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

recently founded, non-notable social network site Passportguy (talk) 17:57, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  --  I 'mperator 18:37, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:WEB.
 * subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself. Not that the article makes out, and I highly doubt it-while google returns over 7 million returns, the majority of the hits are simply promoting the site (as evidenced by the top results).
 * won a well-known and independent award from either a publication or organization Nope. None that the article makes out, and searches give the same result.
 * distributed via a medium which is both respected and independent of the creators Not at all. It's no different than the other million sites out there. A million other sites are also up. Cheers.  I 'mperator 18:41, 30 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not notable and very spammy. Drmies (talk) 19:37, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. The people who founded this and its investors are very notable.  Check out the internal links.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vp2420 (talk • contribs) 15:53, 1 May 2009 (UTC)  — Vp2420 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete, possibly db-web speedy. Google news search finds no reliable sources. Also consider the articles on its founders Matt Meeker and Peter Kamali (created by Vp2420) for deletion; I've tagged them with db-bio. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:10, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.