Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weedery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Dispensary. Seeing as Weed's mentioned over there it makes sense just to redirect this... (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 00:36, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Weedery

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Should belong to Wikitionary instead of Wikipedia? Ueutyi (talk) 02:05, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - Unlikely enough for a better independently separate encyclopedia article. SwisterTwister   talk  08:53, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment. There are hits on Google News.  The New York Times ran this story about it, which was then picked up by The Independent in England.  If it's hitting the British press, it's probably notable.  But I guess an argument could be made to merge this into meadery as a variant. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:39, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 07:05, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep Nominator does not give a reason for deletion, AFD is not for suggesting moves Seasider91 (talk) 20:10, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I see a nominator saying its a WP:DICDEF and suggesting deletion by sending it here. Legacypac (talk) 07:29, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Dispensary. It's a slang term for marijuana dispensary, not a separate concept. NY Times and other reliable sources have used it, making it a sensible redirect. Seems straightforward to me. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 03:56, 29 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.