Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weeds Characters: Agrestic Area


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 07:40, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Weeds Characters: Agrestic Area

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This page was created as part of a proposed split that was limited by consensus. The information contained here duplicates information contained in other articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by S trinitrotoluene (talk • contribs) 17:47, 17 October 2011 (UTC)‎


 * I've added the AFD2 template and completed the nomination. No comment on the merits.UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 18:05, 17 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  — frankie (talk) 18:22, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  — frankie (talk) 18:22, 18 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete or merge as completely failing WP:GNG due to lack of references. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:16, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 24 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete: Notability guidelines apply to the inclusion of stand-alone lists and the list-topic of this one does not meet the general notability guideline. This is a plot-only description of a fictional work and an indiscriminate collection of information and, therefore, it is unsuitable as a list-topic per the criteria of appropriate topics for lists. I do not believe that a merge is justified since the content is unreferenced. Jfgslo (talk) 03:14, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.