Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weekend Revolutionaries


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 21:04, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Weekend Revolutionaries

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

non-notable band. Ridernyc (talk) 14:30, 15 February 2010 (UTC)


 * KeepThe band has featured in the Triple J Unearthed top 25 (tracks have since been deleted), sold albums through iTunes, Amazon etc, pressed and sold physical copies, been featured on CD Baby and All Music Guide, is listed on All Music Guide and Rate Your Music etc. and is therefore notable. Just because they haven't played live concerts and are a studio-based band does not mean they are a 'non-notable' band. See band's official website or blog for further details. Gas Panic42 (talk) 22:32, 15 February 2010 (UTC)


 * References


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  —Grahame (talk) 09:59, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:BAND.  I think that if a few more reliable sources were found it should stay, but as of now I don't think it meets the notability guidelines.  Wyatt Riot (talk) 18:56, 16 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment Some further sources to support the band's notability. Gas Panic42 (talk) 04:49, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * None of which appear to meet WP:MUSIC, the notability requirements for articles about bands and other musical artists. Quite frankly, anybody can sell their music on iTunes, get listed on AMG, etc.  What we need are reliable sources showing that this band meets our notability requirements.  Wyatt Riot (talk) 06:19, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JohnCD (talk) 14:06, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:48, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can not find significant coverage for this act in independent reliable sources; does not appear to satisfy any of the WP:MUSIC criteria at this time.  Gongshow  Talk 18:19, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Comment How many times are we going to realist this, 3 deletes and I guess one keep that lists a bunch of blogs. This really should have been a speedy but now it's being resisted yet again? Ridernyc (talk) 14:35, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * never mind got this confused with another debate. I still would like to know why this is being relisted at all though. Ridernyc (talk) 14:41, 23 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:BAND. MikeWazowski (talk) 15:11, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment if this is still here because of the unearthed claim to notability, you should know that means they came in 25th in a an internet battle of the bands. No notability there at all. Ridernyc (talk) 16:12, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Simply being listed on Amazon and Allmusic means nothing if the listings are blank. Other claims are not enough to pass WP:MUSIC. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:26, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.