Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weena (Rotterdam)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) NemesisAT (talk) 19:51, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Weena (Rotterdam)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No indication there is significant coverage of this street. The one ref is from an article that says 400 streets in Rotterdam don't meet pollution standards and only mentions this as the worst. MB 17:22, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:02, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. I reworked the article to emphasize notability and coverage. Weena is a defining street in Rotterdam. Several national monuments and noteworthy buildings are on Weena street. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 03:04, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep major commercial street in major industrial city of Netherlands. jengod (talk) 23:14, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GEOROAD and the WP:GNG. Nomination is a clear and gross failure of WP:NEXIST and WP:BEFORE. Nominator is concerned only with references, not at all with sources. This is not how articles should be nominated. gidonb (talk) 10:39, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. gidonb (talk) 22:20, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep -- per WP:HEY due to great work by Ruud Buitelaar and a clear WP:GNG pass based on those sources. Ovinus (talk) 19:55, 9 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.