Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wehner blower

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --Ryan Delaney talk 17:56, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

Wehner blower and Charles Douglas Wehner
Wehner blower is nicely illustrated, well explained, but completely unnotable and most certainly original research. All Google hits to this term are to Wikipedia and to the inventor's homepage. This is delete. JFW | T@lk  19:07, 10 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Also for deletion his vanity page Charles Douglas Wehner. Same problem. JFW | T@lk  19:10, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete both, non-notability. Also, check out the wacky Wehner's blisters: Melasma_suprarenale. Sdedeo
 * Delete both, for the reason of insanity. Check out his website (delve into it). Hfwd 05:40, 12 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep Seems to me the invention is notable though we don't seem to have described the Bunsen patent yet. Pumps without moving parts are extremely rare. My reading of original research would allow a working proven design?


 * For those who are considering whether to keep the article or not, be aware that the author has also created wikipedia entries that are simply made up (for example see Atromeroptic Law).Hfwd 23:05, 13 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete both. --Jūzeris | Talk 14:53, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete both. And translate de:Wasserstrahlpumpe --Pjacobi 20:52, August 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nonverifiable OR and NN vanity respectively Tonywalton 10:11, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Both, vanity Salsb 11:19, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete both, vanity, unverifiable. Andrew pmk 16:33, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Userfy Charles Douglas Wehner and mergeWehner Blower to user page, Otherwise *Delete both. David Henderson 17:36, 17 August 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.