Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wei Yang Brian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 22:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Wei Yang Brian

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The sources are pure PR, and the article itself is basically advertising.  DGG ( talk ) 18:08, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 1 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - an advertisement for a non-notable and her products, with no genuine third-party reliable sources. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  18:22, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - what Orangemike said.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  22:05, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TNT. I have a soft spot for text about cosmetics whose advertising suggests that they're good for you: it's always fascinating to see the seller attempting to sail between the danger of making any claim (and thus classing their products as medicinal) and that of admitting that they're not good for you. And this article does have some sources. I looked at one of these. In this very recent version, attributed to this page at "Main Line Today" (a Philadelphia paper, it would seem) was: In 1999, Brian returned to the U.S. She partnered with an American chemist and refocused some of the herbal remedies she learned as a child into a line of skin care products meant to heal skin conditions. In 2002 began selling her Wei East beauty brand on HSN (Home Shopping Network) and after becoming one of the fast growing beauty brands on channel, according to Women’s Wear Daily, in 2010 Brian joined forces with Space NK stores in the U.K and U.S. to introduce a 12-unit prestige treatment line called WEI Beauty. However, once we reduce that to what actually appears in that "Main Line Today" page, we get just: Brian refocused some of the herbal remedies she learned as a child into a line of skin care products. In 2002 began selling her Wei East beauty brand on HSN (Home Shopping Network) and in 2010 Brian joined forces with Space NK stores to introduce a line called WEI. (And even here I'm retaining gushy language: instead of joined forces with Space NK stores to introduce a line called WEI I'd have something like had Space NK stores sell a line called WEI -- though I'm not entirely sure of the meaning.) &para; If anybody radically edits the article to remove its pseudosourced ingredients (or of course to source these properly), I'll reconsider my !vote. -- Hoary (talk) 03:51, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.