Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weindel hypersponge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 17:34, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Weindel hypersponge

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Prod contested by author. The article seems to be some sort of joke or hoax: it is about a trivial and uninteresting variation of the Menger sponge, and there seem to be no verifiable sources (or google hits) confirming that anyone names it after Weindel. r.e.b. (talk) 22:44, 25 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: Not sure that it's a hoax, but certainly a 20 year old article in a local newspaper does not qualify as evidence of notability, especially for a technical subject where there is no guarantee that anything was ever evaluated by an expert in the subject. Delete per WP:N.
 * Delete. I can't find any evidence either for the object or its author. Materialscientist (talk) 09:35, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Bizarre, I can't find enough good sources 137.73.68.56 (talk) 12:45, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. This must be some kind of first: no ghits at all!   Sławomir Biały  (talk) 18:09, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Probable hoax. --JohnnyB256 (talk) 21:31, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Obvious. No reliable sources, not notable, possibly hoax. —  æk Talk  07:05, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.