Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weingarten, Schurgin, Gagnebin & Lebovici (2 nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Old AfD asserted notability through Google hits, which is not a valid criterion. Setting aside the Google hits (mostly advertisements or passing mentions) I see no significant coverage in reliable independent sources. Fails WP:CORP. Kafziel Talk 15:04, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Weingarten, Schurgin, Gagnebin & Lebovici

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

NN law firm, pure WP:COI ("Entered info on WSGL 4-5-2006; jlancaster, WSGL employee"). Inexplicably kept at prior AfD. - NYC JD make a motion 06:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, NN law firm (doesn't even claim notability). TJ Spyke 08:10, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I guess it does CLAIM notability (although the claim is unsourced). TJ Spyke 08:12, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Previous AfD is here. Fg2 07:54, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.