Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weird (2016 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus is to delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:29, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Weird (2016 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NFILM with no secondary sources, festival screenings or awards. McGeddon (talk) 09:46, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:39, 24 March 2016 (UTC)


 * and...
 * filmmaker:
 * length:


 * Delete for (at kindest) being far too soon. I gave the article a face-lift but this short film simply does not have the coverage to meet WP:NF. If that ever changes, it can always be resurrected.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 00:49, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. A search brought up nothing that could establish that this per WP:NFILM. I wish the director and crew well, but this is too soon at best. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:22, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, I can confirm that no sources (at all!) were found. GABHello! 19:41, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, no independent secondary sources (apart from IMDB, which is insufficient), fails WP:NF crh23 (talk) 20:55, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:TOOSOON. Opencooper (talk) 04:06, 29 March 2016. (UTC)
 * Do not Delete: IMDB must be a sufficient source, even without festival screenings and awards, but let's just wait until the responses of the film festivals. — 38.122.226.58 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 15:22, 29 March 2016 (UTC).
 * IMDb content is "user-submitted and therefore not generally reliable", it is not a sufficient source. If the film wins awards in the future, the article can be recreated at that point. --McGeddon (talk) 14:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.