Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weirdo (speech)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 10:46Z 

Weirdo (speech)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. I cannot see any future for this page to expand into an encyclopedia article. The word "weirdo" is already included at Wiktionary. ~CS 06:04, 1 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete as nominator. ~CS 06:04, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:WINAD unless someone can address the following concern (in which case WP:WINAD becomes inapplicable): I do not see how this could be made into an encyclopedic article.  Any article would inherently be about the word itself.  I would be more than happy to be proven wrong with an example of how it could be encyclopedic.  -- Black Falcon 06:15, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Realkyhick 06:47, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as nominator. Robinson weijman 07:35, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Terence Ong 恭喜发财 08:09, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete not a dictionary. &mdash; O cat ecir  Talk  11:25, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. ObtuseAngle 16:31, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I created this article, and now I agree with the nomination. Auroranorth 11:37, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete in favour of Wiktionary. --Slgrandson (page - messages - contribs) 21:08, 2 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.