Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Welby Computer Services Limited


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 01:23, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Welby Computer Services Limited

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Utter trivia. No significant importance. Having an outdated computer in the 70s is  is not notability  DGG ( talk ) 17:42, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  18:57, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  18:57, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  18:57, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  18:57, 18 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as I found some links at Books and Newspapers but nothing convincingly better which this article would need. SwisterTwister   talk  18:58, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, particularly because it is largely based on a chat with an ex-employee, another's resum&eacute; and an advertisement in a newspaper. Despite the company's age, not a hint of notability. Sionk (talk) 19:34, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - This is a spider web. The company does have coverage if you check Newspapers.com and Google Books. However, the question is if this article is of significance to the Encyclopedia. I for one say "no" and would recommend merging it with Memotec Data Incorporated. That causes another problem as I am unsure if that article is notable. That company was also purchased by a 3rd company which doesn't have a Wikipedia article and unknown notability. For me, this is a tough one to judge based on notability alone as there is coverage. However, based on the unlikelihood this will help the encyclopedia or merging with another article, I would have to say ignore all rules and delete. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:01, 18 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.