Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Welcome to Alexis Nihon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Alexis Nihon Plaza. Black Kite (talk) 18:02, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Alexis Nihon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm saddened to say this, about what seems an interesting project, but aside from the Montreal Gazette article (and its various reprints) we do not (yet) have enough WP:RS to satisfy WP:NOTFILM. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:15, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:17, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:22, 19 September 2013 (UTC)


 * I've de-orphaned it by adding it to Alexis Nihon Plaza as a See also. If deleted it could certainly be added to the main article as a brief mention, given that Gazette news ref. The article creator also appears to be in a conflict of interest, with some WP:PEA and (self-)promotional language, which would need to be pruned, if kept. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:36, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Arabic: - — Preceding unsigned comment added by MichaelQSchmidt (talk • contribs)
 * No Arabic WP:RS at all, from what I can see. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:06, 19 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete or Incubate. The film was released to the internet four weeks ago and did receive coverage in Montreal Gazette. I cleaned up the article's format and addressed its tone,, but one source does not meet WP:GNG nor WP:NF. We can allow it back into mainspace if (or when) it receives more media attention.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 03:31, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Selective merge to Alexis Nihon Plaza. Not enough sources to meet notability requirements, but warrants a brief mention there due to the Montreal Gazette piece. -- Trevj (talk) 11:22, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil (speak to me) 06:05, 5 October 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.