Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Welcoming of Spring


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G7 deletion. Primefac (talk) 13:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Welcoming of Spring

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is not notable in its own right, and significantly duplicates the Marzanna article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rwrobson (talk • contribs) 21:12, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:12, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:12, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 22:27, 5 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete This is the first time I've seen an article creator nominate their own work for deletion. This might have qualified for speedy deletion. I agree the subject isn't notable. The article itself is unreferenced. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 22:29, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:CSD. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 22:50, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, I've placed the speedy delete tag on it. The article creator has blanked it and nominated it for discussion. It's clear he or she wants it deleted, I think there was an unfamiliarity with the CSD vs AfD tags... Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:18, 6 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.