Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Welfare schemes for women in India


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. We don't have a consensus for deletion, although at a minimum we have consensus that this article requires much cleanup.  Sandstein  06:58, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Welfare schemes for women in India

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I have no idea what this article is trying to be. At worst it's non-notable, at best it's a piecemeal article throwing things together in an attempt to make a coherent topic. Either way, unsuitable for the site. Wizardman 15:19, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 20 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Move to Women's rights in India, or merge to Human rights in India. Most of the information is salvagable, but it's currently a mess, and the title is nonsense. Bearian (talk) 16:10, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge, per, above. Cheers, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 02:38, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

This is what this article tries to be - From birth to death what are the welfare schemes available for women in India. At worst it's non-notable -> Requesting you to say why it's non-notable piecemeal article throwing things together in an attempt to make a coherent topic -> Exactly, Wikipedia tries to do the same. Throwing things together in an attempt to make a coherent topic. Isn't it ?

Even in the talk page I have mentioned the order in which the article can proceed.

Why does an "entitlement" article be moved to "rights" article ?

Title is non-sense ->in what way ?

Commons sibi (talk) 04:44, 25 July 2013 (UTC) 
 * Move to user's personal space for development per WP:USERFY. This article should exist, it should have this name, and it should not be renamed to to either "Women's" or "Human rights in India". However, this article is not ready for the main space. Every statement made in this article needs to come from some cited source. When in doubt, put a citation at the end of every sentence! Also, the sources cannot be self-published by the agency managing the schemes. They have to come from a journalist, researcher, newspaper, or some third-party. I like the idea of this article a lot. Move it to User:Commons sibi's userspace, see if that person or anyone else would develop it, then hopefully if sources are included then it can go live. This is a great idea for an article and I know lots of sources exist.  Blue Rasberry    (talk)   13:36, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 07:14, 2 August 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.