Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Well-being & Progress Index (WIP)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 13:32, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Well-being &amp; Progress Index (WIP)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

New quality-of-life measure with no indication of any coverage or usage outside of its creator. The reference provided in the article is the paper where the creator of the index, L. D'Acci, defines it. There is no evidence of independent reliable sources commenting on or using the index. Accordingly, it fails both the notability and verifiability requirements for articles. —C.Fred (talk) 14:03, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, self-promotion. (I originally PRODded this.) - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 14:51, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. GPrint search indicates no hits. PS. This probably should be reverted as well, it does indicate a source. A single scholarly paper, just published, does not make a concept notable. No prejudice in revisiting this in several years if it can be proven then that the use has spread to other works. Case closed. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 20:32, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.