Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WellEz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 13:52, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

WellEz

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Unsourced, written like an advert, doesn't seem notable Frood! Ohai What did I break now? 21:58, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 7 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - The references in the article are in order:
 * press release
 * press release
 * Not independent as one of the authors is the president and CEO of WellEz
 * Not significant coverage
 * press release
 * press release
 * And my own searches find no significant independent coverage. -- Whpq (talk) 20:33, 7 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete; also unable to locate any sources to establish notability. Zujua (talk) 04:59, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Same as above. — ΛΧΣ  21™  15:48, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: classical spam for a non-notable company, with all known techniques to mask the lack of notability employed. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 17:50, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - The article probably should be titled WellEZ Information Management. The business has some mentions in the news: James Morley joined WellEz in 2009 to manage WellEz On-Demand, and WellEz leased office space in Denver in March 2012.. However, there is not enought source content for the topic to meet WP:GNG. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 12:16, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.