Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wellbeing software group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete has been re-submitted via draft: (where, I hope, it will be rejected). &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:20, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Wellbeing software group

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Rationale was: "Seemingly non-notable small company. Gets only 5 hits in Google News. If more notable under other names then it needs references to prove this. As it stands, it does not seem notable." The references are either primary or just websites that verify the existence of registered UK companies without saying anything about their notability. Even when you add in the Google News hits (which would be an improvement) it still doesn't seem good enough to me. DanielRigal (talk) 18:07, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

SAVE: Welbeing Software group represents one of the largest in it industry (clinical software industry). A number of hospitals (including NHS) uses its applications all over the UK. (for example CRIS is heavily used in radiology rooms). Good point. If you search its subsidary company for example healthcare software solutions in google news, it will provide 98 results (Even worldwide company like Inview Technology, gets 59 results in google news). if you access http://www.wellbeingsoftware.com/about/, you will get its subsidiary companies and under those there are a lot of products. Welbeing Software group is one of the largest PACS integration company in UK for radiology. I will try to enhance the article more, but i am thinking to include more information under their subsidiary companies if i further create those. For the moment, I will remove the deletion tag. Please contact me if you think any further issues, before adding deletion tags. The main issue is Wellbeing software group is one of largest (or the largest) in UK for clinical patient information management for radiology industry for hospitals. So, I believe those companies are needed to be included in Wikipedia. Kind Regards 18:34, 7 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shevonsilva (talk • contribs)

SAVE : it is the largest independent radiology information system (RIS) provider in the UK 18:34, 7 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shevonsilva (talk • contribs)

I already inform the reasons to Mr. DanielRigal in my talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shevonsilva (talk • contribs)


 * I invite anybody interested to read the discussion there and draw their own conclusions... --DanielRigal (talk) 21:50, 7 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Well, that didn't last long. ;-) --DanielRigal (talk) 22:03, 7 June 2015 (UTC)


 *  Delete  - I cannot find significant coverage in multiple reliable sources to establish notability when searching for the parent company nor for any of the subsidiary companies. The company exists, and I am able to find press release material like this, but press releases do not establish notability. The first two references in the article are to business databases which can be used to confirm facts about the company but does nothing to establish notability.  The third reference is to the company's own web site and represents a primary source. -- Whpq (talk) 20:39, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - I am switching to a speedy deletion as the creator of the article has made a copy in draft space: Draft:Wellbeing software group ltd. I see this as essentially the same as an author requested deletion. -- Whpq (talk) 22:44, 7 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. DanielRigal (talk) 21:50, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. DanielRigal (talk) 21:50, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. DanielRigal (talk) 21:50, 7 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.