Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wellywoman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:23, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Wellywoman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BIO. An unsourced biography of a recently deceased local character. Claim that she was "an iconic character" among locals seems to rule out a Speedy A7. Article was redirected to the locality, but undone on basis that there is no mention of her in that article. A dump-and-run, single-edit article creation by an editor who was active for one day, never came back to the article and didn't respond to attempts to discuss it. No reliable sources have been found for this person (not even her actual name). The only coverage found has been in user-generated social media, and much of that was derogatory. Meters (talk) 23:19, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. sst✈(discuss) 07:54, 10 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - no sources and even if there were she wouldn't be notable. There's nothing to suggest that this person even existed. Unknown Unknowns (talk) 13:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - The assertion that the subject was an iconic local character is not supported by any reliable sources. In fact, nothing in the article is supported by any sort of sourcing, nor could I find any myself. -- Whpq (talk) 20:56, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. No substantial coverage from reliable sources offered or to be found. There is a an apparently unrelated blog with the same name. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 05:07, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, the gardening blog is someone else. Meters (talk) 05:12, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 17 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.