Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wendell Maksinczuk Ortega


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 21:57, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Wendell Maksinczuk Ortega

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article about footballer who has never played in a fully-pro league (typically as his club's third or fourth goalkeeper). There is nearly no online Portuguese-language coverage of this footballer other than database entries and transfer announcements such as this which explains his club released him mid-season after he wasn't used (and nothing at all which would be in-depth coverage). He has appeared only in Brazilian state championships (Candango 1, Goiano 1 and Paulista A3), the Brasileiro Série D, and a single Copa do Brasil match, none of which satisfy WP:NFOOTBALL. Jogurney (talk) 21:53, 16 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Firstly an apology. I misread an appearance in the Copa do Brasil as an appearance in Série A when removing the prod on the article. Secondly, there is a long, long recurring argument at WT:FOOTY regarding Série C and Série D in Brazil being fully professional or not. Both have identical rules (a certain number of amateur players, under a certain age, can be registered in squads), and yet for historical reasons Série C is on WP:FPL but Série D isn't. The result of this should either be to add Série D to the FPL or remove Série C from the FPL. Otherwise we are being inconsistent. Gricehead (talk) 22:08, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * No apology is necessary, as I had to check his career history when doing a WP:BEFORE check in any case. :)
 * As far as whether Série C is a fully-pro league, I am very skeptical and believe it should be removed from the list at FPL until we have solid sourcing to support its inclusion. Série D certainly lacks that sourcing as well. Jogurney (talk) 23:37, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  22:14, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  22:14, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  22:14, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone  22:16, 16 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails GNG, likely fails NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 11:11, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails GNG and FOOTY.--Ortizesp (talk) 18:34, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet the general notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:36, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete — Per rationale by both & . Celestina007 (talk) 21:13, 20 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.