Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wendi Adelson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:53, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Wendi Adelson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article is mostly about the murder of her ex-husband not about her. The coverage of the murder appears to be routine coverage of a murder not one that should be covered in an encyclopedia article. Other than her connection to this murder, there is nothing significant about her. Also look at the article and associated AFD for her brother. - GB fan 11:16, 22 February 2017 (UTC) - GB fan 11:16, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Dan Markel. Delete. This person is not notable for anything other than being (or having been) a possible suspect in a murder case, and we don't have articles based only on speculation or suspicion. As in the related article on her brother (which I nominated for deletion after G10 was declined), almost all the content is copied from the Dan Markel article without regard for its relevance here; and the remainder is in large part speculation and suggestion. At the least, it seems to be a coatrack to hang another copy of the Markel page on; at worst, it exists only to smear or disparage the subject. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:53, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Changed from "redirect" to "delete", per below – I was wrong to suggest it. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:29, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Jbh  Talk  14:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Jbh  Talk  14:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Jbh  Talk  14:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  Jbh  Talk  14:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.  Jbh  Talk  14:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)


 *  Redirect Delete. Nothing to see here. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC).
 * Delete and do not redirect. Not a notable legal scholar per WP:PROF and the unsubstantiated accusations against her need to go per WP:PERP and WP:BLP. Do not redirect, and the Dan Markel article also needs cleanup for BLP violations. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:26, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - I see notability here. Throught coverage, sources. this person definitely passes WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 18:35, 28 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.