Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wendi Knight


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 22:59, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Wendi Knight

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No nonscene awards or nominations. Negligible reliably sourced biographical content. Negligible independent reliable sourcing. Claim that she had a director's credit on the installment of a cookie-cutter porn series whose box cover made a fleeting appearance in a notable mainstream film is preposterously far below the level required to demonstrate notability. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 20:52, 9 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as fails PORNBIO & GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 21:28, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:52, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:52, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:19, 10 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - 3x won of awards, 7x interwiki, for me - notable. Subtropical -man   talk   (en-2)   13:10, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * for everyone else and per policy - Not notable. – Davey 2010 Talk 14:26, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * It needs to be said (again) that scene-related porn award wins don't count toward notability. Neither does the existence of other language Wikipedia articles about the subject. How many times will you bring up these invalid criteria? • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Maybe someday WP:SUBTROPICALMAN-NOTABILITY will become a blue link, but today is not that day. Until then, we judge notability on existing guidelines & policies, not on personal opinion. Tarc (talk) 22:02, 10 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Scene awards to not qualify for WP:PORNBIO, no coverage in independent re;liable sources otherwise. Tarc (talk) 22:02, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails PORNBIO with only scene-related award wins. Even if you count Adult Video News as a reliable source, the AVN article is not enough to satisfy GNG by itself. No other significant RS coverage found in search. • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 10 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:PORNBIO, WP:BIO, and WP:GNG. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:20, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom and above editors. Not enough coverage to establish notability.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:33, 16 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.