Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wendy's of Michigan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Mackensen (talk) 16:09, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Wendy's of Michigan
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article does not establish why Wendy's of Michigan is significantly more notable than any other fast food franchisee. Mr.  Z- man  16:31, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing notable about this regional franchisee. Realkyhick 16:52, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep I'd say that being the only Publicly traded Wendy's franchisee has some notability. &mdash; Timotab Timothy (not Timdagnabbit!) 17:20, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * That's enough of an assertion of notability to pass WP:CSD, but is there anything to make it pass the main notability guideline and/or the one for companies? Mr.  Z- man  19:17, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. They are formerly traded, and are on the pink sheets - but the pink sheets don't even imply notability.  It's just another franchisee. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 20:01, 3 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Weak keep, seems like they could pass WP:CORP, but move to Meritage Hospitality Group, which is the parent company and the entity that is publicly traded as MHGU. Googlers take notice. --Dhartung | Talk 04:33, 4 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep and Move to parent company, Meritage Hospitality Group. Nen  yedi  • (Deeds•Talk) 20:37, 4 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Even though they're a publicly traded Wendy's franchisee, they're listed on the Pink Sheets. They got delisted from another exchange (the American Stock Exchange?) because they didn't meet minimum reporting requirements.  Also, according to this press release, the company is "exploring strategic options", which can be translated as, "We're circling the drain."  I can't find any other real sources of news on this company other than press releases, and being listed on the Pink Sheets doesn't really amount to notability, so delete this article.  --Elkman (Elkspeak) 01:23, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete local branches of anything are rarely notable--this is certainly no exception, based on the information available. DGG (talk) 06:32, 6 September 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete per DGG. Dean Wormer 04:11, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per DGG, Dean Wormer —Preceding unsigned comment added by Accounting4Taste (talk • contribs) 21:58, 8 September 2007 (UTC)  OOPS, still mean delete, sorry Accounting4Taste 22:33, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete not sufficently notable for WP:CORP  Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim  01:30, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.