Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wendy-Ann Antanaitis

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete Jtkiefer  T - 23:14, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

Wendy-Ann Antanaitis
married to minor celebrity, non-notable herself NeilN 01:16, 12 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete - Her husband easily qualifies for an article. But she doesn't as she hasn't done anything else to be notable.  The marriage occurred well after the burst of fame of the Rollers was over.  Also, this is probably another copyvio by the same anon editor, who's been copy/pasting bios related to the Bay City Rollers.  --rob 04:21, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per rob Dlyons493 05:45, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep for now. I wish to give the original contributor a chance to clarify the licensing, fix the content, and explain notability.  Multiple Roller-related articles are a "work-in-progress" right now, which is in the process of being cleaned up.  There's now more evidence that she become something of a notable person, receiving attention herself.  See the article and Talk:Wendy-Ann Antanaitis for reasons.  I suggest giving the Roller-related articles some time, and see what happens.  --rob
 * I hope I don't get in trouble for putting this here, please remove it if this is a violation for me to do. I have left a note in the discussion page, please read it before deletion. I am working very hard on everything. Thank you.
 * I don't get it. Why did you think this person would be worthy of an encyclopedia article?  I'll abstain, but I think the first rule of writing is to ask yourself whether you can justify writing whatever you just sat down to write.---CH
 * Thank you for asking, I tried to be as detailed as possible and with the connection to her husband, who I consider a celebrity, I've found their story very interesting, that was it. I thought I did jusitfy what I wrote. That's my opinion and the opinion of others I have asked, but I can respect yours. And I'm glad this's no Eva Braun, Mr. Hillman, I wouldn't have wasted my time on someone like her. Perhaps Christopher Reeve's wife, Dana. I thank Rob for his help and will do better in the future, I'll choose to delete my research, though I thank those who wanted to give me a chance. I want to join this first before I go on with anymore research, so I can seek advise while researching and what is expected. Again, I'm new at this, I thought I was doing a nice, informative job. Thank you.

(talk) 08:53, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wife of very non-notable celebrity. This is certainly no Eva Braun. / Peter Isotalo 15:18, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash; The irony is that her article is longer and more detailed than that of her husband, Ian Mitchell. &mdash; RJH 15:36, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Though her main claim to fame is marrying her teenage "idol." Believe it or not, I think I once read an small article about this woman somewhere when she got married-- the kind of short, heartwarming piece you find in "Reader's Digest" or perhaps more accurately "The National Enquirer".  Too bad hubby's article isn't better, though.Crypticfirefly 00:12, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nice, informative job of describing someone who fails WP:BIO.  Barno 00:39, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Cute story, non-notable person. Delete or Merge with Ian Mitchell. --Calton | Talk 05:06, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn-bio. At most, she should be a sentence or two in the Ian Mitchell article. MCB 06:50, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article has a "Trivia" section, but there's nothing at all in any part of the article that rises above the level of trivia.  Completely unsourced and utterly non-notable even if true. Quale 01:17, 17 September 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.