Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wendy Riva


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. No prejudice towards speedy renomination. Mark Arsten (talk) 05:40, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Wendy Riva

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable autobiography. Fails WP:CREATIVE. Originally BLP Prod, declined with IMDb ref (which is not a reliable source) and two other refs with trivial mentions. No GNews hits. No GBooks hits other than trivial mentions. No significant GHits that I could find. GregJackP  Boomer!   19:09, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Keep. Recently edited, more references, all verifiable. Jbashian (talk) 19:46, 3 August 2012 (UTC) — Jbashian (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Verifiable =/= notable. - The Bushranger One ping only 01:41, 11 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:06, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:06, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Comment - first, I bolded your keep !vote, in accordance with normal AfD style, so the closing admin would not miss your position. Looking at the refs, I see the following problems: There might be an argument for R&G Collective, though I doubt it, but Riva just doesn't have the sources to establish general notability, much less to meet the requirements of WP:CREATIVE. GregJackP  Boomer!   21:36, 3 August 2012 (UTC) 
 * IMDb is not a reliable source and this has been long established on Wiki.
 * Elle Decor is a trivial mention of Riva in a article on a boutique.
 * International relations is a blog and not reliable.
 * R&G Collective is a blog and not reliable.
 * Daily Candy is a trivial mention of the store and of Riva.
 * Los Angeles Times is a trivial mention of Riva in article on the store closing.
 * LA in bloom is a blog and not reliable.
 * Huffington is a trivial mention of Riva in a article on boutique.
 * CBS Local returns a page not found.
 * Stylebeat is a blog and not reliable.
 * Whitehouse.gov is a primary source. Additional secondary sources on the position would be needed.
 * New York Times does not mention Riva and notability is not inherited.
 * Turner is a trivial mention and notability is not inherited.
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 01:41, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:42, 18 August 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.