Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wense Grabarek


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Though the subject appears to be notable, this article needs starting from scratch. Sam Walton (talk) 17:51, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Wense Grabarek

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not sure whether this is a Bio, an WP:NOTESSAY or an unsourced WP:POLITICIAN. It appears to only cover a short segment of life related to the Civil Rights movement of the 60's. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;   &#9743;(talk)  23:10, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete appears to be a real person and possibly even notable but this is just a confusing wall of text, not a real article. Would happily change my vote if someone substitutes something article shaped with references. Artw (talk) 00:17, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 01:41, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 01:42, 5 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete A rambling essay, difficult to follow, unsourced, not written in an encyclopedic manner. If anyone wants to, they can start a new article, but there is nothing in this one worth saving. The king of the sun (talk) 13:30, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced, terribly formatted entry which is impossible to follow and has no unifying theme. This essay does not belong in Wikipedia (or any encyclopedia, for that matter). BenLinus1214 (talk) 16:02, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   -Fim atic   (talk &#124; contribs) 02:50, 8 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Although checking google the individual is notable and deserves an article, there is nothing here upon which to build. No sources, no coherence,  high POV.    78.26   (spin me / revolutions) 15:10, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - This article is unsalvageable. It looks like it's destined for WP:TNT &mdash; kikichugirl  inquire 22:19, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment I just searched Newspapers.com and there are over 100 articles from the 60s on him. Just skimming through them, he looks to have been notable in 1960s desegregation.  I could add these articles, but do you think the current article should just be deleted and then start building a source article? --I am One of Many (talk) 06:56, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I am sure the subject is notable, but this article needs a dose of WP:TNT.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  12:32, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * IaOoM, I think that is what most of us are saying.   78.26   (spin me / revolutions) 12:44, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.