Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Werewolf in a Winter Wonderland (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Nancy Drew Mystery Stories. JForget 00:36, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Werewolf in a Winter Wonderland
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Speedy renomination due to lack of sufficient participation in previous debate to determine consensus. Novel which does not meet WP:NB or WP:GNG - it's a book in a series with no notability inherited from that series. Carolyn Keene is not an author but a pseudonym used by 10 or more authors, and the author of this novel is not considered notable enough to have an article for him/herself. Therefore, criterion 5 does not apply, and I don't see how it can meet any of the other criteria - there's very little significant coverage in reliable sources. Claritas § 11:58, 11 July 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:15, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:08, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete with a Redirect to Nancy Drew Mystery Stories, as a non-notable member of a very large series. All of the 56 original or "classic" stories in this series have their own WP articles, but the 100+ later ones from a different publisher are considered to be a separate and much less notable series, and most of them do not have articles. This is the final book in that second series. In the absence of outside coverage, it is non-notable. --MelanieN (talk) 18:10, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete and Redirect as per MelanieN. General lack of notability for this 'second' series of books makes it hard to see how WP:N is fulfilled. Eddie.willers (talk) 14:24, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.