Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wereworms


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:43, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Wereworms

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

So this article's a bit of an odd one. Super obscure Tolkien concept, little notability in Middle earth, no notability on the real earth. So the article was created in 2015, and was immediately redirected. The redirect was then undone by the creator of the article (who has been indeffed since 2017), who bypassed AfC to recreate the article and then apparently removed the unreviewed tag himself. See. I don't see this article passing WP:GNG, a reason why the redirect should have been undone, or a clear redirect target since List of Middle-earth animals is no more. Hog Farm (talk) 19:53, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:09, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:09, 7 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Totally non-notable cruft and obvious WP:GAMING. Fails WP:GNG.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 03:08, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Honestly, this article is merely another piece of rubbish that should have been deleted a long time ago. &#8213; Susmuffin Talk 03:13, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Jack Upland (talk) 08:14, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 19:36, 7 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Also, lol. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 13:49, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete These come from basically one throw away line. The slight development in a recent film is clearly not enough to make them now notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:58, 9 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.