Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Werner Holzwarth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 19:50, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Werner Holzwarth

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

This article lacks credible sources and is not up to Wikipedia standards. Plus, the creator of this article has been vandalizing other pages and creating silly pages like You infant. MRoberts &lt;&gt; 19:41, 21 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Non-notable professor; possible vanity article. Soltak | Talk 00:44, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, vandal-made, substandard article Pete.Hurd 04:23, 20 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions.  -- Pete.Hurd 02:19, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * not a professor primarily--look at the article--he's a visual artist. and should be judged as such. I dont know enough about the criteria there to judge. --I though we discussed the articles & their subjects. DGG 06:20, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. I cant find much about the building house university; unless that fact can be filled in, I see little hope. It may be called "university for organization"; see  John Vandenberg 08:01, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Holzwarth is almost certainly notable enough for an article (and the unsubstantiated claim by Soltak that this is a vanity article should be removed as defamatory, not least as it also implies that he also vandalized Wikipedia). But this is machine-translated from the German Wikipedia and cannot be cleaned up without making a real translation from the original. Please nuke it and let someone else start the article from scratch. (Oh, and "building house" is a literal, machine-translated version of "Bauhaus".) up◦land 14:27, 25 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.