Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Werum IT Solutions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Körber. valid ATD. Star  Mississippi  01:25, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Werum IT Solutions

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Notability tagged since 2012, promo tagged since 2014, doesn't appear to meet the stringent notability guidelines for companies. Deleted from de-wiki in 2017: "no encyclopaedic relevance" asilvering (talk) 20:10, 3 May 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Consider the possibility of a redirect (to where?) as an alternative to deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:13, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Germany. asilvering (talk) 20:10, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect: The discussion in the de.wiki equivalent process in 2017 included consideration of the award sources before concluding with deletion. Since then, there are client reviews of the Werum PAS-X product collated by Gartner and announcement-based coverage of industry product awards, but I don't think these are sufficient to demonstrate notability either for the company/brand under WP:NCORP or if the article was repurposed to be specific to their product set. This acquisition / brand is not mentioned on the Körber page and merging might be WP:UNDUE there, but a redirect to Körber may be an WP:ATD option. AllyD (talk) 08:05, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I think you're certainly right about a full merge being WP:UNDUE, but right now a redirect would be really confusing since Körber doesn't mention it at all. I'm not really sure where I'd put it. I suppose a couple of sentences could be added under "History" about the acquisition? -- asilvering (talk) 19:10, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * The History section there is the possible target, probably in the vicinity of the "packaging for pharmaceutical products... expanded further through acquisitions" text. However that article section is currently in prose (comparing favourably in that respect with many company articles which become pin cushions listing every transaction announcement). Before distending it to mention Werum, I feel evidence (beyond the Manufacturing Chemist item that I added to the Werum article) of its intrinsic significance would be need, which takes us back to the Notability challenge. AllyD (talk) 07:06, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Redirect to Körber as per AllyD's reasoning and WP:ATD, otherwise since the topic fails NCORP, Delete.  HighKing++ 10:51, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: or redirect, either of the two options sounds good. - Hatchens (talk) 05:24, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails NCORP. Jacona (talk) 06:59, 17 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.