Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wes Blogg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Daniel (talk) 10:53, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Wes Blogg

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

MLB player with a 10-day career, other than databases there does not seem to be any coverage Valereee (talk) 21:13, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Valereee (talk) 21:13, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
 * As with all 19th-century MLB players, Blogg has an entry in The Rank and File by David Nemec; his entry is actually pretty extensive compared to some of the others and almost certainly counts as significant coverage. MLB.com hosts a "blog post about the only MLB player named Blogg", pretty brief though; there's also brief newspaper articles I located about incidents he was involved in while umpiring, see Cincinnati Enquirer and Philadelphia Inquirer. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:33, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Baseball, Maryland, Pennsylvania,  and Virginia.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  01:31, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - the SIGCOV from Nemec's book and the Cincinnati Enquirer article means Bloggs meets GNG. There's also a bit about him in this, though I wouldn't rely on it to establish notability. Hatman31 (talk) 02:19, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. There is enough out there to establish notability and these 19th century players need to be given a bit more leeway. Spanneraol (talk) 02:21, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Here's a mention of him in the Virginian Pilot in 1962 – Muboshgu (talk) 04:10, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per GNG. Rlendog (talk) 14:23, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Appears to pass WP:GNG. BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:50, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: Based on his book entry and the other sources mentioned above. Oaktree b (talk) 17:04, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable enough to pass GNG. Kkb091 (talk) 19:06, 13 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.