Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wes Farnsworth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:31, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Wes Farnsworth

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NGRIDIRON, has never played in a professional game. Of the sources in the article, Fansided isn't really reliable (basically a collection of team sports blogs), and the other two sources are just routine signing statements. is not significant coverage. Gets a total of two sentences of coverage at  is very brief. [https://denver.cbslocal.com/2020/07/20/denver-broncos-special-teams-brandon-mcmanus-2020-training-camp-preview/ is only two sentences. I'm not finding much coverage of his college career, either. Long snappers don't get much coverage, and Farnsworth doesn't seem to be an exception. Hog Farm Bacon 23:28, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 23:28, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 23:28, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 23:28, 15 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:03, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Logs:

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio 11:14, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete a lack of truly substantive coverage at a level that would show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:40, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete based on the article as it is written, it looks like there is no substantial coverage to pass WP:GNG nor any other notability measure I can find. There's a lot of "noise" among the search engines for fan blogs, transaction records, etc... but those are typically ignored for the purposes of establishing notability.  This means the article itself is really all I can go on, and it is lacking.  If an enthusiastic editor wishes to userfy or incubate, I would have no objection but also have low expectations.--Paul McDonald (talk) 15:00, 27 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.