Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wesley Bible


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:37, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Wesley Bible

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NB Coolabahapple (talk) 06:48, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Around 250 Google hits for, but none of them look reliable.  It's got a bunch of hits on Google Books, but almost all of them seem self-published.  Authorhouse and such.  Maybe someone else can find a few reliably published sources, but I'm not optimistic. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:12, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not meet WP:GNG after an intensive look. If something is there, it is buried. Basileias (talk) 10:37, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment I don't know about any Thomas Nelson (Edinburgh) version but John Wesley's The New Testament, with Explanatory notes, by J. Wesley is a famous Methodist study bible. See The Cambridge Companion to John Wesley. I'm personally agnostic whether to keep (but rewrite) the stub, move it to a different name or redirect it to John Wesley. 24.151.10.165 (talk) 18:24, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for that note. Maybe we should alert WikiProject Christianity?  Part of the problem is that there isn't really enough context to tell what this article is supposed to be about. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:21, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I would encourage this to (redirect) become part of the John Wesley article. I am not seeing enough to warrant its own article. Even if one or two sources appear, it probably won't be much more than a paragraph at most. As it sits now, the article is one sentence. Basileias (talk) 23:51, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 23 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect to John Wesley per discussion above. 24.151.10.165 (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - I think a redirect is completely unnecessary as the topic isn't particularly notable as a severe lack of reliable sources demonstrates. --ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 02:40, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.