Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wesley Charitable Foundation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:35, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Wesley Charitable Foundation

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:CORP. The Wesley Charitable Foundation has not been the subject of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources.  The left orium  16:45, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, no assertion of notablity. Wuh  Wuz  Dat  17:06, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

[Please use this Policy to use to keep from deletion]

The secondary sources prove its existence and this foundation is solid and in my opinion it adds value and substance to Wikipedia as a whole and does indeed improve it.


 *  Speedy delete: Copyright violation: per nom--TParis00ap (talk) 17:10, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't think this is a copyvio, as it appears the information has been released under the CC-By-SA license .  The left orium  17:16, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Got it, thanks. Page is blocked from work but I google cached it.--TParis00ap (talk) 17:35, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, Not notable. Sources have to prove more than mere existence. Hairhorn (talk) 18:35, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, Does not meet the requirements set out at WP:ORG. While I am sure that the Wesley Charitable Foundation does very good things in the community, Wikipedia is not the place to promote it. This Foundation is simply not notable enough for a Wikipedia article.  Google News has no hits, Google only gives us a few hits (the orgs own website, and a bunch of charity look up sites ... nothing that gives any detail).  Perhaps in time it will qualify, and the article can be re-created, but not now. Blueboar (talk) 21:20, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this organization. Joe Chill (talk) 23:27, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: nonnotable. - Altenmann >t 23:45, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete No assertion of notability -Drdisque (talk) 20:08, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.