Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wesley Johnson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE.  Rob e  rt  T 01:14, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

Wesley Johnson
This page makes no assertion of notability whatsoever - this guy's only claim to fame is that he had a website, which, in this day and age, is hardly unusual enough to put this guy in the Wikipedia. &spades;P M  C&spades;  03:51, 31 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete - non-notable bio ERcheck 05:18, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete under A7. -- Captain Disdain 08:14, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * delete as vanity, but not speedy: a claim to fame is an assertion of notability. (It is the assertion that matters, not the assertion's validity. Note we have articles on people who run successful websites.) I agree there should be a faster way to get rid of these obvious deletes, but A7 doesn't cover it, IMO. &mdash; brighterorange  (talk) 14:45, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Dalbury 16:56, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy NN, vanity. PJM 17:36, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete This is not speediable. The guy's "claim" is that he gets "loads of hits".  Still, NN, vanity. Xoloz 19:29, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as per WP:CSD A7. Hall Monitor 19:45, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nonsense vanity garbage. - Sensor 01:54, 1 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.