Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wesley M. "Pat" Pattillo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. — Kurykh  23:51, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Wesley M. "Pat" Pattillo
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Doesn't seem to pass Notability's requirement of "significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." 650l2520 07:51, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:


 * Weak Delete Everything found through google news about these people are from press releases, which are not enough to establish notability Corpx 16:43, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Corpx. Insufficient independent press coverage. Uranometria 00:49, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete These are essentially vanity entries, but well-written. Ironically, serious but uninformed efforts to improve the two articles by obviously involved individuals have brought attention to them.  I'd rather see the deletion of a bunch of the poorly written, poorly sourced entries on porn actors who are considered notable because they made a film or two, but one case is not relevant to the other.  -Jmh123 01:45, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete both. I don't see any reliable sources for these articles, for example press coverage in independent media. It is possible that press articles might be found by a diligent search, but when notability is not open-and-shut, I don't think it is up to the AfD reviewers to go out and find the coverage. EdJohnston 02:52, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete This article smacks of WP:COPYVIO of the G12 sort; it looks like it was lifted and reworded from the bio of the subject at the NCC website. --Aarktica 23:42, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.